In molecular biology and biotechnology, prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems are two independent approaches used to create proteins, enzymes, or other molecules of interest for a variety of uses, including research, medications, and industrial activities. The decision between these systems depends on the particular requirements of the experiment or manufacturing process. Each system has benefits and drawbacks.
In molecular biology and biotechnology, prokaryotic expression systems are frequently employed to create desired proteins. In these systems, recombinant proteins are expressed and produced using prokaryotic bacteria as hosts, usually Escherichia coli. Protein manufacturing benefits from prokaryotic cells’ ease of use and speed as compared to eukaryotic cells.
Prokaryotic expression systems are frequently used in research, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology for applications spanning from fundamental science to drug development and industrial processes. They are particularly helpful for generating proteins that do not require complicated post-translational modifications.
To make proteins and investigate gene function, eukaryotic expression systems are frequently used in molecular biology and industry. Eukaryotic cells, which include those of animals, plants, fungi, and protists, have a distinctive compartmentalized structure. These organelles include a nucleus, which is responsible for transcription and RNA processing, as well as endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus, which are involved in protein folding and post-translational modifications. The creation of complex proteins that need appropriate folding, glycosylation, and other post-translational modifications benefits from the use of these systems.
Applications for eukaryotic expression systems include biotechnology (research and creation of new goods), pharmaceuticals (production of therapeutic proteins), and functional genomics (examination of gene function by overexpression or knockdown).
S.No. |
Aspects |
Prokaryotic Expression System |
Eukaryotic Expression System |
1 |
Cell Type |
Prokaryotes (e.g., bacteria) |
Eukaryotes (e.g., yeast, mammalian cells) |
2 |
Nucleus Presence |
No nucleus |
Nucleus present |
3 |
Chromosome Structure |
Single circular chromosome |
Multiple linear chromosomes |
4 |
Transcription |
In the cytoplasm |
In the nucleus |
5 |
Transcriptional Machinery |
RNA polymerase |
RNA polymerase I, II, III |
6 |
mRNA Processing |
Minimal or no processing |
Extensive mRNA processing |
7 |
Introns and Exons |
Usually no introns, few exons |
Introns and exons are common |
8 |
mRNA Capping and Tailing |
Minimal or absent |
5′ capping and 3′ polyadenylation |
9 |
Splicing |
Rare or absent |
Common |
10 |
Ribosome Binding Site (RBS) |
Present in the mRNA |
Not applicable |
11 |
Translation Initiation Factors |
Shine-Dalgarno sequence used |
Kozak sequence used |
12 |
Ribosome Location |
Cytoplasm |
Cytoplasm and endoplasmic reticulum |
13 |
Post-Translational Modifications |
Limited |
Extensive |
14 |
Protein Folding |
Occurs co-translationally |
Occurs post-translationally |
15 |
Membrane Protein Expression |
Challenging |
Easier in eukaryotes |
16 |
Codon Usage |
May differ from host organism |
Matches host organism |
17 |
Glycosylation |
Rare or absent |
Common |
18 |
Signal Peptides |
Few signal peptides |
Abundant signal peptides |
19 |
Secretory Pathway |
Limited or modified |
Well-developed secretory pathway |
20 |
Folding Chaperones |
Limited |
Abundant |
21 |
Intracellular Compartments |
Few, if any |
Extensive organelles (e.g., ER, Golgi) |
22 |
Protein Trafficking |
Simpler |
Complex |
23 |
Post-Translational Sorting |
Limited |
Extensive |
24 |
Post-Translational Targeting |
Few pathways |
Numerous pathways |
25 |
Protein Expression Time |
Rapid (hours) |
Slower (days) |
26 |
Expression Yield |
High |
Moderate to high |
27 |
Protein Complex Assembly |
Simpler |
Complex |
28 |
Gene Regulation |
Less complex, often inducible |
Complex, tissue-specific, and regulated |
29 |
Protein Glycosylation |
Less common |
Common |
30 |
Protein Disulfide Bonds |
Rare or fewer |
Abundant |
31 |
Protein Modifications |
Limited |
Extensive |
32 |
Immunogenicity |
Lower |
Potentially higher |
33 |
Host Compatibility |
Limited to specific hosts |
Broader range of hosts |
34 |
Scale of Expression |
Suitable for high-throughput applications |
Suitable for pharmaceuticals and biologics |
35 |
Biomanufacturing |
Common for industrial processes |
Used in pharmaceutical production |
36 |
Post-Translational Stability |
May have shorter half-lives |
Often more stable |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: In prokaryotic expression, what are inclusion bodies?
Recombinant protein aggregates called inclusion bodies can develop in prokaryotic expression systems. They can be difficult to recover from and might need extra processes for protein folding.
Q2: How can protein expression in prokaryotic systems be optimized?
The best bacterial strain, promoter, induction conditions, and growth medium must all be chosen. It can be very important to optimize the host organism’s codons.
Q3: What is the purpose of eukaryotic expression systems?
When proteins need to be folded into intricate structures or undergo certain post-translational changes, such as glycosylation or the creation of disulfide bonds, eukaryotic systems are used.
Q4: What benefits can eukaryotic expression systems offer?
The ability to create physiologically active proteins with the appropriate post-translational modifications and optimal protein folding is one benefit.
Q5: Which eukaryotic expression hosts are most typical?
Yeast (such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae), mammalian cells (such as HEK293 cells), and insect cells (such as baculovirus expression system) are examples of common hosts.
Q6: Which expression system should you choose between eukaryotic and prokaryotic?
The option is determined by the needs of the protein. Eukaryotic systems are favored if post-translational modifications or appropriate folding are important. Prokaryotic systems can be used to produce simpler proteins at a low cost.
Average Rating