Two closely related molecular biology strategies, RNA Interference (RNAi) and Antisense Oligonucleotides, are used to control gene expression by focusing on particular RNA molecules inside a cell.
A normal biological process called RNA interference (RNAi) takes place in cells and regulates gene expression and protein synthesis. It is a method through which certain messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules, such as small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or microRNAs (miRNAs), can be prevented from translating or remaining stable. The targeted gene may be effectively silenced as a result of this interference, which can result in the repression or downregulation of gene expression.
RNAi is essential for a number of biological functions, such as the control of gene expression, protection against viral infections, and preservation of genome stability. As a potent tool for gene silencing in research and as a potential therapeutic strategy for treating diseases brought on by the overexpression of particular genes, such as some malignancies and genetic abnormalities, scientists have also utilized RNAi. Researchers can selectively mute the expression of certain genes by creating synthetic siRNAs or miRNAs that target certain genes, which may lead to the development of brand-new therapies.
Short synthetic DNA or RNA strands known as antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are used to target and control the expression of certain genes in living things. The reason they are referred to as “antisense” RNAs is that they are made to be complementary to a particular messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence, which is the molecule that transports genetic information from DNA to generate proteins.
Antisense oligonucleotide’s main job is to control gene expression by attaching to the target mRNA through base pairing.
The use of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic strategy for a variety of genetic and genetically-related diseases, such as certain cancers, neurological disorders, and uncommon genetic diseases, has shown promise. As a result, precise and highly focused therapeutic treatments are possible. They can be created to directly target the mRNA of disease-causing genes.
S.No. |
Aspect |
RNA Interference (RNAi) |
Antisense Oligonucleotides |
1 |
Mechanism of action |
Double-stranded RNA |
Single-stranded RNA or DNA |
2 |
Target molecule |
mRNA degradation or translational inhibition |
mRNA degradation or translational inhibition |
3 |
Natural occurrence |
Present in cells |
Exogenous molecules |
4 |
Endogenous regulation |
Part of the cell’s regulatory system |
Not naturally occurring in cells |
5 |
Length of nucleotide sequence |
Typically 21-23 nucleotides |
Variable lengths |
6 |
Trigger molecules |
siRNA, shRNA |
Antisense oligonucleotides |
7 |
Strand orientation |
Double-stranded (sense and antisense) |
Single-stranded |
8 |
Nucleotide modifications |
Typically unmodified |
Can be chemically modified |
9 |
Delivery methods |
Vector-based or synthetic siRNA |
Chemically synthesized |
10 |
Specificity |
Sequence-specific |
Sequence-specific |
11 |
Efficiency |
Highly efficient |
Varies depending on design |
12 |
Cellular machinery involvement |
RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) |
Not dependent on RISC |
13 |
Off-target effects |
Possible off-target effects |
Fewer off-target effects |
14 |
Duration of action |
Transient (days to weeks) |
Prolonged (weeks to months) |
15 |
Gene silencing effectiveness |
Effective for highly expressed genes |
Effective for moderate expression levels |
16 |
Sequence complementarity |
Requires perfect complementarity |
Requires partial complementarity |
17 |
Enzymatic processing |
Dicer processes long dsRNA into siRNAs |
No enzymatic processing required |
18 |
Stability in cells |
Susceptible to degradation |
Relatively stable |
19 |
Application in therapeutic drugs |
Widely used in drug development |
Increasingly used in drug development |
20 |
Knockdown mechanism |
Cleavage of mRNA |
Blockade of translation |
21 |
Delivery challenges |
May require viral vectors or nanoparticles |
Easier to deliver directly |
22 |
Immune response |
May trigger immune responses |
Lower risk of immune responses |
23 |
Potential for toxicity |
Potential for off-target effects and toxicity |
Lower potential for toxicity |
24 |
Cost and production |
Relatively expensive to produce |
Easier and cheaper to produce |
25 |
Sequence design flexibility |
Limited flexibility due to strict complementarity |
More flexibility in design |
26 |
Long-term therapeutic potential |
Limited due to transient effect |
Potential for long-term therapeutic use |
27 |
Clinical trial stage |
Several RNAi-based drugs in clinical trials |
Antisense drugs in clinical trials |
28 |
Approved therapies |
Several RNAi-based therapies approved |
Fewer antisense therapies approved |
29 |
Gene editing applications |
Not suitable for gene editing |
Suitable for gene editing |
30 |
In vivo delivery |
Challenging in some cases |
Easier in vivo delivery |
31 |
Regulatory approval |
Established regulatory pathway |
Evolving regulatory landscape |
32 |
mRNA destabilization |
May lead to mRNA degradation |
Typically leads to mRNA stabilization |
33 |
Therapeutic targets |
Suitable for a wide range of targets |
Suitable for specific targets |
34 |
Tissue penetration |
Limited by delivery challenges |
Better tissue penetration |
35 |
Stability in biological fluids |
Requires protection from nucleases |
Relatively stable in fluids |
36 |
Sequence design for knockdown |
Stringent design requirements |
More relaxed design criteria |
37 |
Mechanism of action specificity |
Depends on sequence complementarity |
Depends on binding affinity |
38 |
Exon skipping applications |
Not suitable for exon skipping |
Suitable for exon skipping |
39 |
Degradation of target mRNA |
Common outcome |
Not always required |
40 |
Cellular uptake |
May require transfection reagents |
Easier cellular uptake |
41 |
Therapeutic window |
Narrower therapeutic window |
Broader therapeutic window |
42 |
RNA secondary structures |
May affect efficiency |
Less influenced by structures |
43 |
Clinical experience and history |
Well-established technology |
Emerging as a therapeutic option |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: What uses does RNA interference have?
RNAi has several uses in science and medicine, including investigations into how genes function, the verification of drug development targets, and prospective disease-treating strategies.
Q2: What role does RNAi play in our understanding of disease mechanisms?
Researchers can use RNAi to look into the function of particular genes in the emergence of disease. Scientists can learn more about the biological pathways underlying diverse disorders by suppressing genes linked to diseases.
Q3: Do ASO treatments have FDA approval?
Yes, the FDA has approved a number of ASO treatments for various disorders. For SMA and DMD, nusinersen (Spinraza) and eteplirsen (Exondys 51) have received approval.
Q4: What difficulties lie ahead for the creation of ASO-based treatments?
Delivery to the intended tissues, reducing off-target effects, and ensuring adequate therapeutic efficacy while avoiding toxicity are all difficulties. Other problems with various ASO therapy are expense and scalability.
Q5: What distinguishes ASOs from siRNA, or short interfering RNA?
To control gene expression at the RNA level, both ASOs and siRNAs are employed. However, siRNAs are double-stranded and activate the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, whereas ASOs are single-stranded and often function through RNase H-dependent processes or splicing regulation.
Q6: What are some of the therapeutic uses for ASOs?
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and some cancers are among the hereditary and uncommon disorders that ASOs have the potential to treat. They can be applied to control the expression of genes linked to illness.
Average Rating