CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN Genome Editing
Difference Between

 33 Difference Between CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN Genome Editing

0 0
Read Time:4 Minute, 36 Second

In the fields of molecular biology and genetics, CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN are two potent genome editing methods. Both methods offer a wide range of uses in research, biotechnology, and medicine and let scientists accurately alter the DNA of creatures, including people. 

Scientists can precisely edit the DNA of live organisms using the cutting-edge gene-editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, or CRISPR for short, are particular DNA sequences that may be discovered in the genomes of bacteria and other microbes. These sequences act as an immune system for these species, assisting them in their defense against viral infections.

The “Cas9” component of the term stands for the molecular shear protein CRISPR-associated protein 9. It can be designed to aim at particular DNA sequences and perform exact cuts there. When a cut occurs, the cell’s built-in repair system intervenes to mend the DNA. Then, new DNA can be inserted at the cut spot, enabling researchers to add, remove, or replace particular genetic information.

Similar to CRISPR-Cas9, TALEN editing (Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nuclease) uses a distinct chemical mechanism to target and change particular DNA sequences. By making specific alterations to an organism’s DNA, TALENs are created to alter its genetic code.

TALE proteins and a nuclease are the two major parts of TALENs. Bacterial proteins called TALE are made to recognise particular DNA sequences. The TALE protein has a repeating sequence of amino acids that can be altered to match the desired DNA sequence, which is the basis for their specificity.

S.No.

Aspects

CRISPR-Cas9

TALEN

1

Origin

Derived from bacterial immune system

Engineered from naturally occurring proteins

2

Targeting Flexibility

Can target various sequences by changing guide RNA

Requires designing new proteins for each target

3

DNA Recognition

Uses RNA guide to recognize target DNA

Uses custom-designed proteins to recognize DNA

4

Specificity

Can have off-target effects

Generally has higher specificity

5

Delivery

Often delivered as RNA or DNA into cells

Typically delivered as proteins into cells

6

Size

Relatively smaller molecular components

Larger protein-based components

7

Ease of Design

Relatively easier to design for different targets

Requires protein engineering for each target

8

Efficiency

Highly efficient for most targets

Variable efficiency, may require optimization

9

Cost

Generally more cost-effective

May be more expensive due to protein production

10

Genome Integration

Can introduce random mutations or insertions

Mostly induces double-strand breaks

11

Repair Mechanism

Utilizes cellular repair mechanisms

Also relies on cellular repair mechanisms

12

Workflow

Faster and easier to implement

Requires more time and effort for protein design

13

Off-Target Effects

May result in off-target mutations

Generally has fewer off-target effects

14

Target Site Accessibility

Requires a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)

Less restricted in target site selection

15

Customization

Easy to modify guide RNA sequences

Custom protein design for each target

16

Multiplexing

Can target multiple sites with multiple guide RNAs

May require the co-delivery of multiple TALENs

17

Editing Range

Effective for both small and large insertions/deletions

More suited for smaller insertions/deletions

18

Transgenic Organisms

Widely used in generating transgenic organisms

Less commonly used for this purpose

19

Availability

Widely available as plasmids and kits

Limited availability of custom TALENs

20

Risk of Immunogenicity

Lower risk of immune response

Higher risk of immune response due to protein delivery

21

Patent Landscape

Numerous CRISPR-related patents

Fewer patents related to TALENs

22

Ethical Concerns

Raised ethical concerns due to ease of use

Fewer ethical concerns but not as widely discussed

23

Epigenome Editing

Can be adapted for epigenome editing

Less adaptable for epigenome editing

24

On-Target Efficiency

High on-target efficiency

Generally lower on-target efficiency

25

Therapeutic Applications

Widely explored in therapeutic research

Less explored in therapeutic applications

26

Flexibility in Editing Modes

Allows for knockout, knock-in, and other modifications

Mainly used for gene knockout

27

Delivery Challenges

Less challenging in terms of delivery

Requires optimization for efficient delivery

28

Clinical Trials

Numerous clinical trials involving CRISPR-Cas9

Fewer clinical trials involving TALENs

29

Scalability

Easily adaptable for high-throughput applications

May require more effort for high-throughput

30

Learning Curve

Easier to learn and implement

Steeper learning curve for protein engineering

31

Patent Disputes

Associated with several patent disputes

Fewer patent disputes

32

RNA Editing

Can be adapted for RNA editing

Not typically used for RNA editing

33

Community Adoption

Widely adopted by the research community

Has a smaller user base in comparison

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Are there any genome editing technologies besides CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN?

ZFNs and meganucleases are examples of other genome editing methods, however CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN are now the most popular because of their effectiveness and usability.

Q2: What are some of the difficulties posed by genome editing?

When adopting genome editing techniques, researchers must contend with issues such as off-target effects, unintentional genetic modifications, and the delivery of editing tools into target cells.

Q3: Can humans employ TALEN or CRISPR-Cas9 for medicinal purposes?

It’s true that TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 have both been researched for potential therapeutic uses, including the therapy of genetic disorders. Clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate their effectiveness and safety.

Q4: What distinguishes TALEN from CRISPR-Cas9 technology?

As it is simple to set up CRISPR-Cas9 to target many genes, it is renowned for its versatility. On the other hand, TALEN can be more difficult to design yet might be advantageous in some situations.

Q5: What distinguishes germline and somatic genome editing?

Somatic genome editing entails making alterations to a person’s bodily cells’ DNA that are not passed on to their progeny. On the other hand, sperm, eggs, or embryos’ DNA can be altered via germline genome editing, and any modifications can be passed down to future generations.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Related posts

50 Difference Between Cloning and Genetic Engineering

Team BiotechWale

34 Difference Between Microarray and Next-Generation Sequencing

Team BiotechWale

43 Difference Between Bioremediation and Bioaugmentation

Team BiotechWale

44 Difference Between Fermentation and Bioprocessing

Team BiotechWale

43 Difference Between RNA Interference (RNAi) and Antisense Oligonucleotides

Team BiotechWale

48 Difference Between Western Blot and ELISA Assays

Team BiotechWale

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *